|
|
Post by McNugget on Jan 12, 2013 19:04:08 GMT -5
didn't realize how clicky things were, beyond the group of friends and/or neighborhood, until someone mentioned the link between LE and owner(s) of the bar... then got to wondering if that might play into how this is being investigated. got the feeling the crowe family is more blue collar and wonder if those not answering questions thought they could just roll over them without a question. family is proving them wrong. also get the feeling these so called friends are fake and jealous of the natural physical beauty of S. read early in the first thread that someone had said, "she fit right in," like she was being interviewed to join the housewives of washington township. wondering if this might have played a part in how people behaved that night. Not that it matters, but I have heard she had quite a bit of plastic surgery done on her face and her chest. If you look at her older pic like the one with her short hair you can see the different in the face. Just pointing that out. I also heard at one time the their face book status stated they had a open relationship. What pic with short hair?  |
|
|
|
Post by McNugget on Jan 12, 2013 19:08:39 GMT -5
I keep randomly posting the link to this board on topix cuz they keep removing it! Welcome you two, glad you saw it :) I also agree this will not be solved and it makes me sick. Squa, why did you ask if they smoked? Thank you squalal. I was wondering where everyone went! Thank God McNugget keep coming to the topix board and trying to post the link to the new forum. I finally found it....yeah. I do not understand why they keep deleting the link if they want to get us off there so bad. And why do they keep deleting our post!!! Right! What a crock of shit! They wanna delete our posts but yet won't let us congregate to a new board somewhere! ::) It's insane. Glad you're here 4real. |
|
|
|
Post by whatmatters on Jan 12, 2013 19:10:55 GMT -5
All I know is that someone that night has got the answers to the events of that night. And all their lips are sealed. No one will say at all what that argument was about! Which means they are hiding something. Otherwise, why the big deal. I think the argument must have enough other people. I believe is arguing was just between her and her husband.
|
|
|
|
Post by whatmatters on Jan 12, 2013 19:12:42 GMT -5
Not that it matters, but I have heard she had quite a bit of plastic surgery done on her face and her chest. If you look at her older pic like the one with her short hair you can see the different in the face. Just pointing that out. I also heard at one time the their face book status stated they had a open relationship. What pic with short hair? I attached the link below. ts2.mm.bing.net/th?id=H.4671885895139531&pid=15.1 |
|
|
|
Post by McNugget on Jan 12, 2013 19:13:16 GMT -5
All I know is that someone that night has got the answers to the events of that night. And all their lips are sealed. No one will say at all what that argument was about! Which means they are hiding something. Otherwise, why the big deal. I think the argument must have enough other people. I believe is arguing was just between her and her husband. Well they keep telling us the details of that night or whether or not there was an argument and what it was about doesn't matter and isn't any of our business. I just think that has got to be CYA because if that were the truth, why not just say that S and V had a disagreement about this or that...  |
|
|
|
Post by McNugget on Jan 12, 2013 19:14:25 GMT -5
Hmm yeah I've seen that before and just thought it wasn't as flattering of a pic, like less makeup or something. How old is the short hair pic? |
|
|
|
Post by whatmatters on Jan 12, 2013 19:14:44 GMT -5
Thank you squalal. I was wondering where everyone went! Thank God McNugget keep coming to the topix board and trying to post the link to the new forum. I finally found it....yeah. I do not understand why they keep deleting the link if they want to get us off there so bad. And why do they keep deleting our post!!! For some reason it seems like they just want us to shut up and go away. We are attracting too much attention. They just want to sweep it under the rug. It makes me sick to think that is what will end up happening. Right! What a crock of shit! They wanna delete our posts but yet won't let us congregate to a new board somewhere! ::) It's insane. Glad you're here 4real. |
|
|
|
Post by whatmatters on Jan 12, 2013 19:17:17 GMT -5
Hmm yeah I've seen that before and just thought it wasn't as flattering of a pic, like less makeup or something. How old is the short hair pic? I am not sure. But, she was open about the boob job. But look at her check structure and face compare the two. Definitely plastic surgery |
|
|
|
Post by whatmatters on Jan 12, 2013 19:24:34 GMT -5
hERE are some captions from Web Sleuth
The screen shot of Vern Loepp from the CrimeStoppers video in that article speaks volumes. His stance suggests strongly that he did not want to be there, and his positioning away from his wife's family is very telling - they're on one side of the "story" about what caused Sandra to leave the restaurant on foot that night, and Vern's on the other and doesn't want to talk about it. If we ever find out what the couple argued about, we'll probably have a good idea about what really happened and who might be responsible for the fatal hit-and-run. Personally, I don't think that it was a random driver who struck Ms. Loepp: I think Sandra was mowed down by someone who was at the party that night.
|
|
|
|
Post by whatmatters on Jan 12, 2013 19:25:40 GMT -5
More from web sleuth: Newest article to be released since shortly after the Crime Stoppers Presser: www.sourcenewspapers.com/arti...c681155787.txtThe timing of this article is very ironic to say the least.... a little late on this story ya think ..... and on the same day the Original Topix thread was removed from the internet... hmmmm very interesting..... We all know that thread brought up some very interesting discussion which included why DH has remained so silent about the events of that evening. My guess is this article was prompted by one of the "friends" in the "circle". Its all in who you know in some parts....If you read this it attempts to put DH in a more positive light. From what has been uncovered over the last few weeks we know he's no angel. Did they watch the same Presser I did??? This was the most awkward Presser I have ever encountered. Those tears seemed forced to me not like he was "fighting them back" as stated in the caption Not to mention his demeanor and body language exhibited during this was one of the most defensive and closed off I have ever seen by a spouse! Especially one that is supposedly devastated and pleading with the public for help! To me it came off more as feelings of guilt of some sort, even if that guilt is only of not watching out for her interests that night. Now if he had the same demeanor as Sandras youngest sibling I may have bought into that statement "fighting back tears". She gave one of the most heartfelt pleas I have ever heard in the cases I've followed |
|
|
|
Post by whatmatters on Jan 12, 2013 19:28:20 GMT -5
This is all that was said about agreement I did find the comment attached to this article interesting. It seems to fit the bill for what the fight may have been over. A comment contained here... www.clickondetroit.com/news/Crime-Stop... "A close friend of hers said her and her husband argued because she was flirting with another man and he left her at that bar." |
|
|
|
Post by McNugget on Jan 12, 2013 19:30:15 GMT -5
More from web sleuth: Newest article to be released since shortly after the Crime Stoppers Presser: www.sourcenewspapers.com/arti...c681155787.txtThe timing of this article is very ironic to say the least.... a little late on this story ya think ..... and on the same day the Original Topix thread was removed from the internet... hmmmm very interesting..... We all know that thread brought up some very interesting discussion which included why DH has remained so silent about the events of that evening. My guess is this article was prompted by one of the "friends" in the "circle". Its all in who you know in some parts....If you read this it attempts to put DH in a more positive light. From what has been uncovered over the last few weeks we know he's no angel. Did they watch the same Presser I did??? This was the most awkward Presser I have ever encountered. Those tears seemed forced to me not like he was "fighting them back" as stated in the caption Not to mention his demeanor and body language exhibited during this was one of the most defensive and closed off I have ever seen by a spouse! Especially one that is supposedly devastated and pleading with the public for help! To me it came off more as feelings of guilt of some sort, even if that guilt is only of not watching out for her interests that night. Now if he had the same demeanor as Sandras youngest sibling I may have bought into that statement "fighting back tears". She gave one of the most heartfelt pleas I have ever heard in the cases I've followed THat link to source newspapers isn't working for me. |
|
|
|
Post by McNugget on Jan 12, 2013 19:30:55 GMT -5
Hmm yeah I've seen that before and just thought it wasn't as flattering of a pic, like less makeup or something. How old is the short hair pic? I am not sure. But, she was open about the boob job. But look at her check structure and face compare the two. Definitely plastic surgery I will go look, but who was she open to about the boob job? Not that I doubt it one bit but just curious. |
|
|
|
Post by McNugget on Jan 12, 2013 19:31:31 GMT -5
This is all that was said about agreement I did find the comment attached to this article interesting. It seems to fit the bill for what the fight may have been over. A comment contained here... www.clickondetroit.com/news/Crime-Stop... "A close friend of hers said her and her husband argued because she was flirting with another man and he left her at that bar." This link doesn't work for me either, but that was actually stated in an article?? |
|
|
|
Post by whatmatters on Jan 12, 2013 19:35:53 GMT -5
H/T to Mr. BDE for sleuthing for information regarding Santino's.
Source: State of Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulation.
Searched for: SANTINO'S RESTAURANT & BAR
ID Num: B6258L Assumed Names
Name:MARIA AND GIANNA OF WASHINGTON LLC
Type: Domestic Limited Liability Company
Resident Agent: MICHAEL A MAGNOLI
Registered Office Address: 59259 VAN DYKE WASHINGTON TWP MI 48094
Mailing/Office Address:
Formation/Qualification Date:12-22-2005
Jurisdiction of Origin:MICHIGAN
Managed by: Members
Searched for: MICHAELANGELO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
ID Num: 541098
Entity Name: MICHAELANGELO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Type of Entity: Domestic Profit Corporation
Resident Agent: MICHAEL A MAGNOLI JR
Registered Office Address: 59227 VAN DYKE WASHINGTON TWP MI 48094
Mailing Address: MI
Formed Under Act Number(s): 284-1972
Incorporation/Qualification Date: 7-30-1991
Jurisdiction of Origin: MICHIGAN
Number of Shares: 1,000
Year of Most Recent Annual Report: 12
Year of Most Recent Annual Report With Officers & Directors: 07
Status: ACTIVE Date: Present
11/03/11 $200.00
Direct (for the election of...)
CTE ANTHONY WICKERSHAM
MAGNOLI, MIKE
6402 BAYPOINTE DR
WASHINGTON, MI
MICHAEL ANGELO CONSTRUCTION
Annual Stmt - 2011
|
|
